DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020 [PATCH] addition of access atribute to <target..> task ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-17 21:10 ------- I would agree that (1) is the simplest. For clarification here and now, access defaults to "public". I would treat the -* targets as a different issue; i.e. if a user can find a way to call a public (explicitly defined as such or otherwise) target named -* from the command line, they are welcome to do so. As a long-overdue response to Gus's question(s) about the attached patch... I think an EnumeratedAttribute should be used for the access values... also, I don't know if the whole "access point" thing is warranted, especially if we choose that access is only relevant with respect to the command line. $0.02 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
