What is the status about closing the 1.6-branch? Jan
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Why are we having the branch after all? (was Re: cvs > commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html) > > > I cannot see any really major changes from 1.6 to HEAD so > would prefer 1.6.2 > as > name. > And if we can get rid of the local 16_BRANCH I would be happy > - holding > these two > trees partially in sync is not easy :-) > > Jan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:17 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Why are we having the branch after all? (was Re: > cvs commit: > > ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html) > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Or should the 15390 be applied to 1.6 as well? > > > > Given the amount of new features we are adding to the 1.6 > branch, this > > has IMHO far outgrown a maintenance branch. The difference between > > the 1.6 branch and CVS HEAD is very small and if soemthing > ends up on > > the branch or not is purely arbitrary - I cannot see a theme here. > > > > Maybe we should rather release a 1.7 from CVS HEAD instead of 1.6.2? > > Or release from CVS HEAD and call it 1.6.2? > > > > Stefan > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
