I would go for fixing the bug without BC, in order not to make the code too complicated.
This is just me though.
Cheers,
Antoine
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Dominique Devienne wrote:
There's no such property, and any new 'magic' property will be a struggle to
get past IMHO. Committers would have to chime in at this point... --DD
It can be a command-line option or a property option. Looks like I can just implement PropertyHelper.replacePropertiesRecursively() and make the use of it or PropertyHelper.replaceProperties() optional.
-- Jack J. Woehr # We have gone from the horse and buggy Senior Consultant # to the moon rocket in one lifetime, but Purematrix, Inc. # there has not been a corresponding moral www.purematrix.com # growth in mankind. - Dwight D. Eisenhower
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
