Matt Benson wrote: > One (slightly messy) solution might be to decouple the > parsing and substitution... thinking out loud here so > forgive any glaring omissions or errors...
What I haven't figured out yet is why you bother to parse in the complicated fashion you do in PropertyHelper.parsePropertyString() ... is this structure being kept around somewhere for access by some other client of PropertyHelper? -- Jack J. Woehr # We have gone from the horse and buggy Senior Consultant # to the moon rocket in one lifetime, but Purematrix, Inc. # there has not been a corresponding moral www.purematrix.com # growth in mankind. - Dwight D. Eisenhower --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
