--- Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[SNIP]
But are there enough usages
> as to grant the
> definition of a full framework for this pattern.
That's backwards... the original idea was not a full
framework to support this pattern... this pattern is
only one possible way to exploit having 1 or 2 custom
tasks that basically behave as inline
<(task|type)def>s. Hardly a full framework, unless I
miss my guess. This is one of my pet ideas, and as
with most, I no longer recall the original use-case
for which I wanted these. Probably convenience, as I
mentioned before...
-Matt
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
