> From: Magesh Umasankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <jalberto () cellectivity ! com> > Date: 2004-06-24 11:30:33 > > > But you are changing the contract of <sequential/>. > > Easy to provide backwards compatibility here - > > <sequential breakable="true"/> > > where breakable is false by default. > > Similar attributes may be introduced to other behavior > altering task containers. >
I think it is ugly, and there is no reason for modifying <sequential/> when you could just as well define a diferent task, like the "<block/>" I proposed. (Not stuck on names, pick a name more of your liking). It is much more easy to write <block> ... </block> than <sequential breakable="true"> ... </sequential> Jose Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
