Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:

Peter,

I just posted something on bug 23942 about a different approach
to this issue that I implemented on my machine at home.

It is a very small addition to macro and it does not require
any changes to the ANT machinery. I think everything we want
to be able to do in macros can be done this way.


Yes I have seen it.
I do not like it, - the [EMAIL PROTECTED] syntax is a bit ikky ;-)
However, it does solve the macrodef use case  so if  people
go for it, I would have no objection.!

Peter

The full implementation provides some additional features to
help you control the scope of <let/> on <antcall>s and such
but all is based on the current machinery. No changes to CORE at all.

If you allow me to post it, or if you look at the example, you can
get a flavor for it.


You should place this as an attachment to the local buzilla report

Peter


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to