Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
For example, the usage of ThreadLocals in other
proposals may be right for some things, but it may be wrong if I am
trying to use properties to communicate between threads. (Which I can do
with regular properties).
You are correct.
Using the following:
<macrodef name="x">
<localproperty name="aprop"/>
<sequential>
<parallel>
<sequential>
<property name="aprop" value="set"/>
<echo>aprop is ${aprop}</echo>
</sequential>
</parallel>
<echo>aprop is ${aprop}</echo>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
One would expect that this macro would produce
[echo] aprop is set
[echo] aprop is set
rather than
[echo] aprop is set
[echo] aprop is ${aprop}
I am modifying the local patch code to do this.
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
