DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942 Addition of a local property ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 08:49 ------- Jose, I do not see the problem with your example. <A/> uses a property (say X) to export some output - therefore it must be a condition of the user of <A/> to know this. <B/> declares X to be local and then calls <A/>, <B/> may now use the output of <A/> without effecting other users of <A/>. So for example: <A/> <B/> <MoreA/> MoreA will use X as set by <A/> and not by the <A/> called by <B/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
