DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32114>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32114





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-11-26 12:46 -------
Our doclet is a very slight "modification" of the standard doclet that simply
knows to include or exclude classes from the javadoc (and inheritance hierarchy
by "pulling down" methods from "hidden" classes into "visible" specializations)
so that we can describe our classes in a manner appropriate for "public" use. We
also want to include the package.html for those packages that contain "visible"
classes.

I didn't write our doclet so can't say for sure whether we can do what you
suggest. Having the ability in Ant to specify packages via the set of packages
for the selected classes or via a selector seems like a generally useful feature
anyway.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to