Hi,
this test case would now also pass if no class has been found at all, is that intentional?
Kind Regards, Martijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
conor 2004/12/22 06:08:23
Modified: src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/depend
DependTest.java
Log:
JDM 1.5 compiler is much smarter than previous versions in the handling of
class references which should improve the performance of <depend>
The test has been changed to work with either, allowing eitehr one or two files
PR: 32557
Revision Changes Path
1.16 +2 -2 ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/DependTest.java
Index: DependTest.java
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/depend/DependTest.java,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -w -u -r1.15 -r1.16
--- DependTest.java 16 Dec 2004 14:01:39 -0000 1.15
+++ DependTest.java 22 Dec 2004 14:08:23 -0000 1.16
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@
public void testClosure() {
executeTarget("testclosure");
Hashtable files = getResultFiles();
- assertEquals("Depend did not leave correct number of files", 2,
- files.size());
+ assertTrue("Depend did not leave correct number of files", + files.size() <= 2);
assertTrue("Result did not contain D.class",
files.containsKey("D.class"));
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]