<joking> or a mixture? dimlet, define-my, local-var, ... or a very personal thing: the class is not typedef´d and the user can choose
or we use something like the-type-which-introduces-the-local-only-available-of-properties-which-are-n ot-available-from-a-different-scope and the user uses a <presetdef> for getting the name ... </joking> Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Dienstag, 11. Januar 2005 13:58 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: local properties > > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Sounds good, but is it possible to get a different name than "let" > >> ? > >> > >> Peter > > > > Following the VBness of "let", how about "dim"? ;) > > Actually it's a Lispness - for those of us who liked the name let, at > least 8-) > > Hmm, borrowing from Emacs lisp, defvar? define-property? > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
