DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-12 00:09 ------- I think you are right, between ant 162 and 170 alpha I can see one difference apart from the time stamp. This difference is in the relative offset of local header (4 bytes) While the offset differs in ant 162, the offset becomes the same in 170 alpha, at the same time zip starts to complain. Problem is the handling of org.apache.tools.zip.ZipEntry. When an attempt was done to optimize the zip code to have decent performance, an equals was added to ZipEntry which is not correct. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
