+1 on the general policy for "ant.*" and "org.apache.tools.ant.*"
-1 for "build.*"; I'm sure there are many projects that use "build.this" 
or "build.that"

-- 
Jeffrey E. Care ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WebSphere Build SWAT Team Lead
WebSphere Build Tooling Lead (Project Mantis)
https://w3.opensource.ibm.com/projects/mantis


Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/14/2005 04:08:28 AM:

> On 13 Jan 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I have declared a policy on what we will name new properties. Is
> > this a good formal policy to have?
> 
> <snip/>
> 
> > If new properties get added (it happens), expect them to appear
> > under the "ant." and "org.apache.tools.ant" prefixes, unless the
> > developers have a very good reason to use another
> > prefix. Accordingly, please avoid using properties that begin
> > with these prefixes, to reduce the risk that future Ant releases
> > break your build file.
> 
> +1
> 
> maybe we should reserve the "build." prefix as well -
> build.sysclasspath and CVS HEAD's build.clonevm.
> 
> Stefan
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to