I think I did understand it. This is a practical example:
<target name="init"/> <target name="clean1" depends="init"/> <target name="clean2" depends="init"/> <target name="clean" depends="clean1,clean2"/> <target name="build1" depends="init"/> <target name="build2" depends="init"/> <target name="build" depends="build1,build2"/>
<target name="clean-build" depends="clean;build"/>
Imposing execution order on "clean" and "build" targets is not enough - clean1 and build1 can still be executed in parallel, so it will not work. In fact you would want to execute targets in that order ("init" is a common dependency):
init;clean1||clean2;clean;build1||build2;build
This seems simple, but now clean2 can depend on "clean0;build1" and order becomes very different. It is still possible to implement, but I am brain dead at the moment to see it all the way through.
- Alexey.
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
I think you misunderstood my syntax ...
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ / Alexey N. Solofnenko home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ /
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
