DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4240>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4240 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-04 23:57 ------- Attaching a mapper to a zipfileset makes no less sense than attaching the prefix and fullpath attributes. I say this because they are not handled transparently or internally, they are merely attached for an interested client to use or ignore. If we add a mapper to zipfileset, we could convert prefix and fullpath to mappers internally: mapper + prefix = chainedmapper (oldmapper + globmapper); mapper + fullpath = mergemapper + log message, or just disallow mappers with fullpath, whichever. Then the only handling a task would have to do would be mapping and getPrefix and getFullpath would only maintain BC. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
