DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-21 14:16 ------- No. A custom stylesheet uses the aggregated XML TESTS-TestSuites.xml in which I've just added the 'id' attribute. So backward compatibility is OK. In case a custom stylesheet should address the bug issue (multiple same testsuites), it may uses the 'id' - but it is really optional. With current status, the bug cannot be addressed by a stylesheet. For example, the 'junit-noframes.xsl' is unchanged because it processes the XML without expected package/name 'testsuite' attributes to be a unique key. junit-frames.xsl has to use a unique key because it generates many files linked together: package index, classes index, -out.txt and -err.txt. My patch proposes to use id/package/name as a key. If another processing uses the generated report as input (which is strange because it is easier to process TESTS-TestSuites.xml), it is true that such a processing has to be updated. But I think it is not in the 'junitreport' contract. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
