DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-01 04:01 ------- > Alternatively, we could try and set the security manager, catch the exception > and back off from the attempt, opting to fork the jvm instead. I know that this kind of "catch a semi-expected exception and alter behaviour" is used frequently in the code, but is there no other way? I personally feel that using exceptions as a flow control mechanism is a code smell. I'd prefer an adapter approach mentioned in the report just my opinion Kev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
