We shouldnt plan the name only for the svn-package. That´s a general question for future extensions. Common prefix org.apache.ant seems to be approved. "Old" stuff keeps under org.apache.tools.ant for BWC.
Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 11:09 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: Antlib package names > > Dominique Devienne wrote: > > >>From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>for the svn tasks I've used > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the > >>"newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit. > >> > >>I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think > antlibs should be > >>somewhere in the package names, so I'd turn the former into > >>org.apache.ant.antlibs.svn. > >> > >>Any other ideas, preferences? > >> > >> > > > >I'm all for dropping tools. But I don't like the sounds of > ant.antlibs. > >I just don't like the repetition. I personally prefer either > ant.libs or > >even just org.apache.antlibs, although the later being a new > top-level > >name is probably not appropriate. > > > >No strong feeling really, but reading ant.antlibs is painful to me > >somehow ;-) --DD > > > > > Perhaps it could be just "org.apache.ant.svn" - i.e. drop antlibs. > > Peter > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
