I am also using CVS HEAD and it seems pretty stable for me. - Alexey.
On 5/23/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > it's my strong belief that part of the reason the javah and move bugs > made it into 1.6.3 is that our branches are living too long. The same > happened to 1.5.2 (which required 1.5.3 quickly) because the 1.5 > branch lived to long (IMHO). > > In my day-to-day Ant usage I use CVS HEAD, all the time, exclusively. > Sometimes I merge changes into the 1.6 branch without merging the unit > tests as well. Sometimes I don't merge changes at all. Sometimes I > forget to pull a change from the branch when it has been pulled from > HEAD ... > > I bet, other committers have similar experiences. > > It's not enough to say users don't beta-test our releases, in all > honesty, after X.Y.1 or maybe X.Y.2 we don't even alpha-test them > sufficiently ourselves. > > This leads me to the subject of this vote. Let's get rid of the > branch, stabelize CVS HEAD and release 1.7.0-beta in a reasonable > time-frame. > > Cheers > > Stefan > > PS: I also intend to start a vote that branches shouldn't live as long > as the 1.5 and 1.6 branches did but we do new releases from HEAD more > quickly. This will wait until this vote has been decided. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com <http://gmail.com> home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)
