>>> >> +1 to XDoclet; the only alternative would be Java1.5 annotations and >> we do not want to go there. > I would reiterate the same thing.
> What about using qdox[1] directly rather than going through xdoclet ? > > [1] - http://qdox.codehaus.org/ interesting, never have used it....I would think that ease of use and performance would have to be a magnitude better then xdoc to validate its usage. cheers, Jim Fuller --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
