DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36890>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36890 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-05 20:31 ------- Sorry Jose, but your comment doesn't make sense to me. XSL also is built on SAX. The issue is whether or not the XSL engine needs to and does in fact buffer the XML document before processing it. In some instances it must. In many it doesn't need to, but it does anyway because it's really difficult to find out when compiling the stylesheet whether true streaming is possible. Or I completely misunderstood you. (Quite possible!) It would not be difficult to write a little SAX program that does the same job a concatenation XSL would do, but that involves writing code. Would be the most robust solution, almost as fast as straight concat, but with XML correctness ensured. --DD -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
