Hi, maybe the simplest solution would be to change this line : < File libraryFile = new File(libraryURL.getFile()); to
> File libraryFile = new File(URLDecoder.decode(libraryURL.getFile())); Comments ? Cheers, Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· >RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT ><http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37085>. >ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· >INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > >http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37085 > > > > > >------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-19 21:54 ------- >I have done a little bit of debugging and used the findings of Ritesh Adval. >Line 503 of AntClassLoader is the one which might be doing the wrong >assumptions. >It says : File libraryFile = new File(libraryURL.getFile()); >This returns a file located in >/C:/Dokumente%20und%20Einstellungen/antoine/ext/AntTaskDepedentLibrary.jar > >for C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/antoine/ext/AntTaskDependentLibrary.jar. > > >The wrong assumption is that java.net.URL#getFile() returns a string with which >one can instantiate a java.io.File. > >I am wondering whether it is not possible to simplify the loop between the >lines >491 and 506 of AntClassLoader, by not converting >String (representing a path) -> URL >then URL -> String (representing a path) >but working with java.io.File or String all the way. > >Or is there a reason why we do this all this walk ? > >Cheers, >Antoine > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]