On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dont know the antlib and dont know .NET - but I dont want to be a > obstacle here. But: if we start with .NET, why not C/C++, Cobol, > ... Maybe it would be better in AntContrib?
I think there is one little difference. When the AntContrib project picked up the C/C++ tasks from different sources there have been no antlibs. Now there is an antlibs subproject. > I see two ways: > - Ant focuses on java language --> no .NET in Ant --> .NET in > Ant-Contrib It doesn't and never has, at least not strongly. Ant is also an important driver for document creation in several non-Java projects for example. > - Ant openes for other languages --> can we integrate AntContrib? Everytime this comes up I have to ask the same question ;-) Has anybody ever asked the AntContrib project whether it wants to be integrated? The AntContrib project has a very different governance model from ASF projects. Curt and Matt are project leaders who are not bound by any votes or even consensus. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
