DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37105>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37105 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-30 19:06 ------- Ant hands off signing to the jarsigner task of the JDK; you can see the command line if you add the -v switch. Dependency logic is limited to checking the dest file being older than the source, not looking for signatures inside. If the jarsigner exe feels that your app needs a second signature, then either it knows what it is doing, or there is something wrong with it. Either way, it is out of our hands. I'd note that SHA-1-Digest and SHA1-Digest are two different strings, and maybe both are required. As it is, I dont see what it is doing is actually invalid. All it is doing is signing it with a different cryptography engine. Marking as wontfix as it is out of our hands. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
