----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:54 PM Subject: Re: <javadoc>'s packagenames attribute
[SNIP] > I agree--my interpretation of backwards-compatibility > is that working builds do not break; it is entirely > permissible to make broken builds work. I can think > of examples where we have added a default value so > that what was once a BuildException due to some > missing attr/element is now legal... the worst that > could happen is that a build generates more doc than > it used to, and that probably presumes the use of > <try>... i.e. not realistic to assume anything working > would be changed at all, much less negatively. > > -Matt I agree too, Antoine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
