On Thu, 25 May 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess junit4 is extra motivation for us to stick a beta of that > out soon.
All we need is a release plan to vote on as well as a release manager ;-) > We discussed where this task would go (antlib under ant vs. antlib > at junit.org), and what the stability/redist implications would > be. junit uses java which is very backwards compatible, though > ant1.7 improves some things. Putting it in with junit4 gives it a > tighter coupling to junit. > > I think the consensus was that the junit CVS repository (on > sourceforge) is the place to do this, I agree, if only sf's CVS was reliable. > 1. Who wants to help work on a new junit task? count me in. > (2) what should it do? > > -Everything in <junit>, At least most of it. > 3. enhancements to junit > > -a method "isFailure" on the assertion failure classes, for > checking (through reflection in ant) for failures vs errors. Yes, that would be handy. But they shouldn't have dropped the difference between errors and failures in the first place. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
