I suppose a problem would be to support this ant98 file.....
On 7/11/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for ant98 plan. Peter On 6/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I think like Dominique. > Regards, > Antoine > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:58:11 -0500 > Von: Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > An: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Dropping Win98 Support for 1.7 > > > +0 to removing support for Windows98 to ant.bat. > > > > +1 to move ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making changes (and > > simply) ant.bat so that it becomes Windows98 incompatible (Alexey's > > suggestion). > > > > --DD > > > > On 6/28/06, Alexey Solofnenko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Now I know why I did not undertand how it worked... Maybe we should > > rename > > > the current ant.bat into ant98.bat and start making incompatible > changes > > in > > > main ant.bat? > > > > > > - Alexey. > > > > > > On 6/28/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Conor MacNeill wrote: > > > > > ant.cmd is for OS/2. Whether that qualifies as a modern > platform, > > I'll > > > > > refrain from passing judgement :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > leads us to VOTE, drop support for OS/2, surely? > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com > > > home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ > > > Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually) > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
