DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21042 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-18 10:51 ------- (In reply to comment #25) > I dont think we should introduce too many attributes - filePathParameter is > redundant. > Actually I think that most people would like to have the path and not directory or name (which I would consider redundant). > I thought about "." instead of "" for "no-dir" by myself and wasnt sure. I'll > change that. > Thanks. > I changed the algorithm for the parent directory from File to String > computing, > so that should be fine now. > The file can still be used but should only for the name. For the directory one should use the calculated path. Is there any reason why the relative file name is calculated for every file even if this functionality was not enabled? If one really wants only the file name calculating the relative path is unnecessary (because one can use inFile.gtName()). I'll attach a patch you could look over. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
