[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, if you put the docs in, you need to follow with the code. <hasMethod>
looks for methods.
Wouldn't hasMember be more appropriate since it can check for fields too?
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/condition/HasMethod.java?rev=420305&view=auto
+ if (method!=null) {
+ return isMethodFound(clazz);
+ }
+ if(field!=null) {
+ return isFieldFound(clazz);
+ }
+ throw new BuildException("Neither method nor field defined");
Should probably also throw BuildException in case both are defined,
since it seems the intention is that one or the other should be.
BTW I notice that this condition cannot check for either constructors or
method overloads. Maybe no one cares.
-J.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] x22801 netbeans.org ant.apache.org
http://google.com/search?q=e%5E%28pi*i%29%2B1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
