On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/8/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So technically modifying the java task to allow your subclass to >> control the CommandlineJava instance that's being used (in the same >> way the JUnit task does) should work. Correct? >> > > Looks not that easy. JUnit task exclusively uses getCommandLine() > method to get the CommandlineJava object, which gives me an > extension point (well, based upon the impl detail though). > > Java task uses "cmdl" variable directly, there's no way I can sneak > anything in there. So, I'm still stuck. :-<
Note that I talked about modifying the Java task. It would be doable (and in fact I'll just do it in a few minutes) to modify the task so that it behaves the same way as the JUnit task does WRT the CommandlineJava instance. I was just checking whether this would be enough for the extensions you have in mind. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
