--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Surprisingly, DD, who is often more frightened by > my > > solutions than Peter, had no comment. ;) > > I thought it was clever and pragmatic. OK, maybe too > clever ;-) But it > reminds me of dynamic languages that allow custom > handling of missing > methods in classes, which is useful sometimes.
:) > > > Peter's suggestion to define as many conditions as > we > > can competes with an earlier imperative to add new > > conditions only to the new condition antlib > mentioned > > above. > > This is also a pragmatic solution, but I like it > less somehow. > > I don't have a magic solution, but I also strongly > agree that we > absolutely need to go away from addTypeOfTheWeek() > methods, and solve > the issue ones and for all. Probably too late for > Ant 1.7, sure, but > I'd hate to have AntUnit go out with a legacy > inheritance to > ConditionBase because we didn't address this issue > once and for all. > I'm still not sure I understand why inheriting from ConditionBase/using TaskAdapter is so terrible, especially if we move the location stuff up to ProjectComponent as Stefan proposed. What am I missing here? > --DD > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
