--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Personally I think we should at least consider > including a 'script' > > > language with the full dist (starting from 1.8) > so that scriptdef > > > isn't a lame duck out of the box. > > > > Biggest problem might be that the language needs > to be license > > compatible. > > Yes I can see this as a problem - sorry didn't > consider it before. >
Talking about flamebait, I'll toss this out there: we could create our own scripting language... with domain-specific slants if/where applicable... this would extricate us from any distribution issues, and, dare I say it, could be fun if we could find ways to make a DSL that is Ant-focused. ;) -Matt [SNIP] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
