Paul King wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
[...] You would like for instance to say : get bsf + groovy + jython but not beanshell for instance.

Forgot to say: yes, this is what I would like to do.

You could have a look at two files written mainly by Steve Loughran, fetch.xml and libraries.properties.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/lib/libraries.properties

A consequence I just realised that would be relevant to this list. If I put all the dependencies in the BSF POM, then I guess you could remove all of the language-related info in fetch.xml and library.properties. These would come down automatically along with Groovy just by downloading the BSF artifact.


I would be strongly -1 to having BSF include everything, as it generates artifact bloat.

My recommendation:

1. add a BSF-full pom that does include everything. Then people who want it, get it, those who don't dont. 2. make the scope of all the various script jars runtime and not compile time. So you dont get your classpath contaminated.

I'd like a version of jython-without-regexps up on the repository too, but that's another issue.

FYI, the maven-to-RDF conversion we are attempting will eventually index every .class in every jar to look for duplicates. If I save a hash of every class we can even do version auditing. Oh, people will fear our auditor program. Working name: repo-man :)

-steve

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to