On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Which parts of AntUnit would you use? >> Only the assertions or the tasks and listeners as well? > > Currently we are only interested in asserts library. Which is pretty easy to keep working cross-version since most of it consists of macrodefs anyway. We certainly couldn't use conditions created in 1.7 (regexp, for example). > It is easy to write them, but it would not be good if the same thing > was done differently in different projects. Of course not. > What is your take on this? I mean, some generic asserts are the same > for AntUnit, WebTest, and TestLogic, but some are specific to the > project. Do you think it is worth the effort to standardize on a > common asserts library and what should be the extension mechanism? I'd leave them in AntUnit and think it should be possible to keep a 1.6.5 compatible branch for them. > In the future, we may be interested in AntUnit runtime (task and > listeners) as well, depending on the direction our project takes. Which would require more work since more code is written in Java then. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
