On 11/5/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
> On 11/5/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I hit the send button a bit too fast.
>>
>> I want to ask :
>>
>> OK to release these files as Ant 1.7.0RC1 on Sunday, November 12th, as
>> Ant 1.7.0RC1 ?
>>
>> Yes [x]
> Do we have to wait that long?
>
The problem is that :
a) according to bylaws, votes are open one week
b) two files, index.html and antnews.html indicate the date of the
release. So it is predetermined to be Nov 12th.
We would have to change the distribution to release on another date.
If we want to release faster after a build, we would have to change our
bylaws. Otherwise there is a small risk that one guy wakes up on the 6th
or 7th day of a vote and writes a -1.
Ok makes sense.
I have a fix for:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40900
The bug means that javadoc#setdocletpath path is ignored.
(which is pretty serious)
Index: src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java
===================================================================
--- src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java (revision 471681)
+++ src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java (working copy)
@@ -732,7 +732,9 @@
* @return a new DocletInfo instance to be configured.
*/
public DocletInfo createDoclet() {
- doclet = new DocletInfo();
+ if (doclet == null) {
+ doclet = new DocletInfo();
+ }
return doclet;
}
but do not have write access to svn at the moment.
Should rc1 be respun for this?
Peter
In this case we would be in a sort of institutional trouble.
Regards,
Antoine
> Peter
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
