My comment was on the define feature in <macrodef>
it has been in the build for a while (~a year). It was placed
there as an experiment, but I do not think that people have
used it (as there is no comments, and it does not fullfill
its usecase - it leaves removable properties). If it is left in now,
it will be there forever! (due to BC).
Peter

On 12/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I do think we should not be adding any functionality between a RC and the
final build, would I be the only one (I already have my doubts on doing
non-essential things between the RCs).

Martijn

> Hello,
>
> I will build a candidate for 1.7.0 this evening then.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:26 +0000
> Von: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7.0 ?
>
>> On 12/12/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hello Peter,
>>>
>>> my plan was to build Ant 1.7.0 final last Sunday, but I delayed this.
>>>
>>> What are the critical changes we are waiting for ?
>>
>> I assumed that there was to be another RC from emails
>> sent ("delay the RC (steve).")
>>
>> I do not know of any critical changes, except
>> maybe to suppress caching resource collections.
>>
>> We need:
>>    to add extra diagnostics for junit (the missing
>>    vmwatcher file issue),
>>    manual pages for the new script options for scriptdef, scriptselector
>> etc.
>>
>> However these are not critical.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>> On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:52 AM, Peter Reilly wrote:
>>>
>>>> I thought that the plan was to have an RC2.
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>> On 12/12/06, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> JDK6 has just been released (I'm downloading now), can we hold final
>>>>> 1.7.0 until we've done a smoke test on Java6/JDK6 on major platforms?
>>>>>
>>>>> This will also give us more time to test Peters javax.scripting work
>>>>> on a compliant platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Kev
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to