DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28882>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28882 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-08 08:14 ------- Obviously I'm all for it, since I extended <sequential> just for this purpose myself. In addition to if/unless, I had ifTrue/unlessTrue and os/osFamily conditions as attributes. Having <sequential> accept any condition would force to use another nested element to separate the condition from the sequential content, no? Unless we play tricks like saying "if first child is a condition, it's not content but a controller for sequential itself", which I'm not fond of. --DD -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
