On 3/9/07, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No,
I do not like this.
We have svn in ant core, and due to bc reasons
opps that should be cvs....
we always will.
I would perfer to move svn to ant core, or
at least bundle the ant-svn antlib with the release
of ant so that one does not have to
do an extra download.
Peter
On 3/9/07, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since we have an svn antlib, I was thinking should we move the cvs
> code out of the core into it's own lib?
>
> I've done the majority of the work (setting up the projects copying
> and renaming code etc), but I need to know whether this is acceptable
> for sandbox or not?
>
> For BWC we could delegate calls to the normal CVS task to the antlib
> version for now and then later remove the stub in the core after a
> reasonable amount of time has passed.
>
> My rationale for doing this is to get most of the SCM stuff out of the
> core and into separate antlibs. CVS is just low-hanging fruit so I
> thought we could at least give it some thought.
>
> Any objections?
> Kev
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
