On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Matt Benson >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Surely we can't go there... maybe we'd better rethink the >> > "instanceof FileResource" idiom instead, e.g. >> > isFilesystemResource()? >> >> Or throw in an interface that contains getFile() and is implemented >> by FileRessource - and modify the "instanceof FileResource" idiom >> to "instanceof that new interface". > > That gives me a nice comfy feeling. Good. > If we simply mandate that this type of Resource classification > should always be interface-defined (we probably should have done > this from the beginning +1 > ), we can use JDK1.3 proxies and avoid cglib, +1 again. > Another cool thing seems to be that we could provide > some kind of ResourceCollection that could proxy the > resources from another collection but provide their > content in files even for non-file resources Yes, that sounds interesting. We could throw in similar things to attach permission bits to ressources that are not archiveressources and so on. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
