For file permissions, I think we have to use refection to see if the file object supports the api. I do not think that we can use pure java to check the permissions (except by using exec hackery) for pre java 1.4.
Peter On 4/24/07, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"No" for file permissions too? - Alexey. On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42219>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42219 > > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-24 10:09 > ------- > #1 > Thanks mike for the build.xml, it would be nicer > to be completel self contained - perhaps a > bash/python script to create a big directory, and the > build.xml to use this (see: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/etc/performance/build.xml?revision=448449&view=markup > for an example of a selcontained test. > > #5 > I do not think that we should do this (provide a pre-jdk1.4 jar) for > this problem. > > > > -- > Configure bugmail: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Alexey N. Solofnenko Home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 usually)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
