--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Stefan Bodewig
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Instead of what we have in Equals it should
> probably be
> >
> > public void setArg1(Object a) {
> > if (a instanceof String) {
> > setArg1((String) a);
> > } else {
> > somePrivateArg1Setter(a);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > public void setArg1(String a) {
> > somePrivateArg1Setter(a);
> > }
>
> Is anything wrong with that approach?
I had to go back and fully understand what was going
on, but I see now what you're doing with this
change... yes, it does seem like this could solve the
BC issue here.
Although I actually can't see any reason why IsGreater
extends Equals anyway, but once again, that would
theoretically be a BC issue for ac if they took it out
now. Anyway, I forgive you, Dale... ;) Or if I've
missed some obvious reason for the inheritance, you
can forgive me!
-Matt
>
> Stefan
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for
today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
