The pom.xml should start with the usual apache header to indicate that the pom itself is licensed under Apache license. There was a discussion some weeks ago that suggest it is a good practice.
Also in the pom, I think it would be better to use <optional>true</optional> rather than just <optional/>. By the way, did someone already run RAT against it? Gilles > -----Original Message----- > From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mercredi 5 décembre 2007 3:13 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 > > I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 > > You can download it from this URL: > http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-beta1/ > > Do you vote for the release of these binaries? > > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > > Regards, > > Xavier, Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 release manager > > -- > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ > http://www.xoocode.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
