Geronimo use the dist directory [1], UIMA use also their distribution directory [2], Maven host it on codehaus [3], Harmony use their web-site [4], and as Xavier said, Apache Directory also use their web site [5].
If it is technically possible, I guess using the mirrored dist directory is better. We should may be check that with infrastructure. I tried to search the archives, but it seems that I don't have the required karma (or that I didn't look at the right place). [1] http://geronimo.apache.org/geronimo-eclipse-plugin-installation-instructions.html [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-659 [3] http://markmail.org/message/ipgrfz725czfzhkg [4] http://markmail.org/message/ybqoy5emzdfjoxlr [5] http://directory.apache.org/studio/update/1.x/ 2008/5/26 Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Le mardi 20 mai 2008, Gilles Scokart a écrit : >> I didn't use IvyDE, but I'm +1 for an alpha or beta release seeing >> that recent bug reports starts to be reported against "The latest >> build (May 16 from www.hibnet.org)" [1] or from xoocode [2]. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-93 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-90 >> >> 2008/5/19 Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > +1 for an IvyDE release. >> > I'd prefer a beta release instead of an alpha release though... >> > > > As there is no objection since last week, let's go for an IvyDE release ! > > As suggested by Xavier, I vonlonteer to be the release manager. > > Marteen raised a question about the name of the release. For me, "alpha" > means "release that developers know it to be unstable" and "beta" is > for "developers think it has minor bugs but is stable, then let's the users > test it". > For me it is unstable, mainly due to IVYDE-82 and currently I saw that > IVYDE-54 can freaks out Eclipse. > So I vote for "alpha". > > Then about the release, in order to follow the Apache guidelines, some work > need to be done about packaging the source of IvyDE. I will look about how > the sources are usually packaged for the Eclipse plugins. We should probably > have different kind of packaging: the source got from an updatesite, and the > full sources which also contains the build system. > > We will also probably need an Apache Ivy updatsite. For the few tests I have > done with my own one, it is not working properly, updates are not detected... > Some investigation will be needed here too. > > About the documentation, I have finished migrating the IvyDE website, so now > there is the "history" category, like the Ivy site. I think we should publish > it as soon as we get an IvyDE release adopted. WDYT ? > > And the documentation in the binary distribution. Could a simple link to the > website be enought ? Or should we push the html doc into the zip ? > > In the Apache doc, I can read: >> If svn:externals is used, check carefully that a tag is referenced. This > ensure that all the source for the release is fixed. If the target of a > svn:externals changes then the release will no longer be complete > reproducible. > So shouldn't xooki be released somehow ? > > Does anybody see any other points that need to be addressed before starting to > build a release ? > > Nicolas > > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ---- >> > From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> >> > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:19:40 PM >> > Subject: Re: Releasing IvyDE >> > >> > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Nicolas Lalevée >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Recently there were some users complaining that there is no release of >> >> IvyDE >> >> compatible with Ivy 2. [1] [2] >> >> >> >> I know that IvyDE is not stable. See some major issues in Jira. For some >> >> people it is even getting less stable: [3] >> >> >> >> But then I wonder if we could still do an alpha release, just to get >> >> people less annoyed by the 1.2 version which has some terrible issues >> >> [2], and probably more bug report, and hopefully more people interested >> >> in contributing. >> >> >> >> WDYT ? >> > >> > I'm a strong +1 to get an alpha release of IvyDE out. I don't have much >> > time currently though, but according to the high quality of the job >> > you've done so far on IvyDE and its build system, I'm confident you are >> > able to be the release manager for this version if you want. >> > >> > Xavier >> > >> >> Nicolas >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-ivy-user/200805.mbox/%3cB03 >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-65 >> >> [3] >> >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ant-ivy-user/200805.mbox/%3cDA8 >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > -- >> > Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant >> > http://xhab.blogspot.com/ >> > http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ >> > http://www.xoocode.org/ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Nicolas LALEVÉE > ANYWARE TECHNOLOGIES > Tel : +33 (0)5 61 00 52 90 > Fax : +33 (0)5 61 00 51 46 > http://www.anyware-tech.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Gilles Scokart --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
