I try it for you sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as this is the form to use according to http://ant.apache.org/mail.html "How to unsubscribe your old email address"
So maybe you'll get a confirmation. Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Vijay Aravamudhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 22. September 2008 14:34 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: DirectoryScanner Memory Consumption > > hi, > I would like to unsubscribe from this list. I have tried > multiple times > with the automated unsubscribe process - but it doesn't work. Please > remove me from this list. > > thanks, > Vijay > > On 09/22/2008 03:07 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Stefan Bodewig<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Something in File.getCanonicalPath seems to consume memory that > >> isn't easily reclaimed by the GC, and I have no idea what we could > >> do about it. > >> > > > > except increasing the number of times we are allowed to traverse > > directories of the same name before we check whether they > are part of > > a symlink cycle. svn revision 697692 bumps it to five > instead of one. > > > > Just to show where we've come now (and I think I'll stop at this > > point): > > > > small setup > > =========== > > > > matchall using pathconvert > > -------------------------- > > > > Ant 1.6.5 1 min 30 s ~ 19 MB > > Ant 1.7.0 3 min 53 s ~ 24 MB > > Ant 1.7.1 9 s ~ 21 MB > > svn rev 697073 3 s ~ 26 MB > > svn rev 697692 2 s ~ 19 MB > > > > matchall using resourcecount > > ---------------------------- > > > > Ant 1.7.0 1 min 25 s ~ 21 MB > > Ant 1.7.1 8 s ~ 14 MB > > svn rev 697073 2 s ~ 17 MB > > svn rev 697692 2 s ~ 16 MB > > > > big setup > > ========= > > > > matchall using resourcecount > > ---------------------------- > > > > Ant 1.7.1 14 min 2 s ~ 55 MB > > svn rev 697073 53 s ~ 78 MB > > svn rev 697692 22 s ~ 64 MB > > > > "small" is 10000 directories and about 22000 files spread > accross four > > levels, "big" is one level more and an order of magnitude > of files and > > dirs more. > > > > The numbers differ a bit from the last I've posted because I had > > ANT_OPTS=-Xmx512m set last time, this time svn rev 607073 consumes > > less memory but takes longer while I'm reasonably happy > with speed and > > memory consumption of svn rev 697692. > > > > Overall we've roughly gone from quadratic time to linear time when > > scanning directories - and we even scan small directory trees faster > > than 1.7.1. > > > > Stefan > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
