1. Maybe they have a different meaning what a "defect" is. 2. They havent checked the codebase a long time ago ...
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Montag, 6. Oktober 2008 11:04 >An: dev@ant.apache.org >Betreff: Re: FYI: Ant listed as "defect free" > >On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Fortify has listed Ant on https://opensource.fortify.com/ as "defect >> free". > ><https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=ad vanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Ant&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwo>rdssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_st >atus=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_ >to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailrep >orter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=incl ude&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=> > >seems to disagree (and I trust that link more ;-). > >Stefan > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
