I'm ok for a 2.1.0 release with r801820 merged. For a 2.1.1 I'm not sure a RC is really necessary... If we have only bug fixes without too heavy changes I think releasing 2.1.1 directly without prior RC is ok. If something goes wrong we can release a 2.1.2 and that's fine.
BTW, thanks a lot Maarten for your involvement and for stepping in for this release! Xavier On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 23:36, Maarten Coene <maarten_co...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > the second release candidate for Ivy is now some weeks old and it's time we > decide what to do next. > > I'd prefer to promote this RC2 as final 2.1.0 release, but merge revision > 801820 from trunk which fixes a regression introduced in RC2. > Furthermore, since trunk contains fixes for some annoying bugs, we could > create a 2.1.1 release candidate later this month after the 2.1.0 final > release is out. > > I'm willing to do the 2.1.0 final release if there a no other volunteers. > > Maarten > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > -- Xavier Hanin - 4SH France - http://www.4sh.fr/ BordeauxJUG creator & leader - http://www.bordeauxjug.org/ Apache Ivy Creator - http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
