Great news. Peter
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2010-02-24, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >> To account for the bug report it may be a good idea to ignore existing >> properties only if we are importing with a prefix. > > and look for an existing property with the prefix when using one. > > I have a modified version that passes the testcase I've added for 48768 > and a new one I've written for the "Gump is broken" scenario and will > commit it as soon as it has completed the full test suite (about fifteen > minutes from now). > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
