On 2010-03-04, Wascally Wabbit <wascallywab...@earthling.net> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2010-02-26, Simone Cato <simonec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is this the intended effect of multiple <local>s within the same scope? >> Probably not a conscious choice. <snip/> > Well I was a bit surprised actually as that's not > mentioned in the <local> description. I thought <local> > let me re[un]define a property within a local scope > ONCE. In actuality it fundamentally changes what > <property/> means even within a single scope. <property> > no longer creates a write-once, read-many item within > a single scope. Like I said, I don't know whether this was intended when local properties were introduced - and it isn't documented either way. OTOH we'd have a hard time changing it now after the release of 1.8.0 even if we now realized it to be wrong. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
