I guess this brings up a bigger issue (again) which is when will we modernize Ant?
I know that backwards compatibility is a huge thing, so I don't want to step on toes, but it sure would be nice to be able to read and contribute to ant's code with java6 features instead of java4 features. java4 and java5 have been EOL'd... so maybe ant 2.0 would be good someday...the solution is to just keep development on the 1.x branch going as well. i know found a document in the wiki talking about ant ng, but i can't find it now... (and no, i don't consider maven a replacement) jon On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2011-02-04, Jesse Glick wrote: > >> On 02/04/2011 09:03 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: >>> I did not know that using a final variable for the upper bound of a loop >>> instead of something.size() makes a difference in terms of performance. > >> Generally the preferred idiom is to use an iterator, > > Absolutely agreed, but that would have been a bigger change so I shied > away from it (as well as from replacing Vectors with some other lists in > various places). > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
